Ben Franklin’s writing often parallels Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe from several angles.
Other than Franklin’s direct mention of a longing for the sea, minute details
regarding food and specific amounts of money owed allude to Defoe’s novel,
considered the prototype for all English novels. Colonial interpretations of Robinson Crusoe fit this autobiography in the sense that both
Crusoe and Franklin find ways to display vanity in knowledge and
experience. Franklin holds almost
every person he introduces in his autobiography to some amount of debt, and he
often places his prose in competition not with his peers, but rather those much
older than him. Franklin’s
emphasis on reason and understanding also highlights some themes from the
Enlightenment period. Franklin
writes that he endeavored to strengthen both his “elegance of expression” and
his “arrangement of thoughts” (15-16).
Both of these thoughts are consistent with that of the 18th
century as a whole, which placed a large significance on the advance of science
and understanding. Today, science
still relies on a valuable understanding of past studies, as they often form a
basis for all subsequent studies.
Franklin
also sheds light on what could be considered the central themes of both science
and philosophy. His father’s
suggestion that “nothing was useful which was not honest” holds great value
when considering the establishment of scientific finding and moreover the
delivery of such knowledge to the general public (11). Franklin also notes that he avoids use
of absolute words when making an argument, as to uphold the idea that no
argument can be certain.
Scientific theories are known as theories for a reason, and scientists
work with the understanding that no finding is an absolute truth. It seems discouraging that a career
could be spent establishing theories that will most likely be outdated in the
future. However, this process is
necessary. Right?
To
reflect more freely, I think an interesting theme of this writing is idea that
people are meant to go into specific professions. Often times in his autobiography, Franklin mentions his
doubts that an acquaintance of his will have success in a certain career, and
he goes as far as suggesting that they do not pursue these paths. While this discouragement does still
exist today, it is significantly limited when compared to Franklin’s
suggestions. Our society is much
more supportive of youth exploring all options for their future. Major changes en route to a college
degree are more common than ever.
Does this disparity between Franklin’s time and the present have any
effect on the successes or failures in certain professions? Are we scientists, or are we attempting
to be?
No comments:
Post a Comment